WebAug 1, 2014 · DASHRATH RUPSINGH RATHORE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Indian Case Law. Banking Law. DASHRATH RUPSINGH RATHORE Vs. STATE OF … WebSupreme Court in Dashrath Roop Singh Rathod V State of Maharashtra (2014) 9 SCC 129, learned MM directed to return the complaint and supporting documents to the complainant within 30 working days from the date of order, as the drawee bank was located outside the territorial jurisdiction of Dwarka
M/S Kph Dream Cricket Pvt. Ltd vs Nvd Solar Ltd. Etc on 1 …
WebHon'ble Supreme Court in the case of "Dashrath Roop Singh Rathod Vs. State of Maharashtra & Others", Criminal Appeal No. 2287 of 2009, the trial of the offence must be logically restricted to the place where drawee bank is located and in the WebFacts of the case. The present judgment has arose out of 8 Special Leave Petitions filed before the Supreme Court of India, with respect to dishonour of cheques in an area falling under jurisdictions of certain courts, … how do ventless heaters work
Sec 138 n.i. act - lawyersclubindia.com
WebNov 3, 2024 · In this case, the Two-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court had held that the offence under Section 138 of the NI Act can be completed only with the concatenation of … WebIn order to further explain its intent, the judgment clarifies, that merely leading of evidence at the pre-summoning stage, either by way of affidavit or by oral statement will not exclude applicability of the judgment in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod’s case (supra). WebOct 28, 2024 · BRIEF FACTS: 1. This appeal arises from a judgment dated 12 January 2024 of the High Court of Gujarat. The High Court dismissed an appeal against the judgment of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate dated 30 August 2016 by which the first respondent was acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 . how do venture capitalists value a company