WebJun 4, 2016 · Each column type (like string, int etc) get different Zlib compatible algorithms for compression (i.e different trade-offs of RLE/Huffman/LZ77). ORC+Zlib after the columnar improvements no longer has the historic weaknesses of Zlib, so it is faster than SNAPPY to read, smaller than SNAPPY on disk and only ~10% slower than SNAPPY to write it out.

DEFLATE vs. zlib vs. gzip - Github

WebJun 30, 2024 · Those levels do in fact deliver better compression than legacy libraries like zlib – they’re not just there for granularity. e.g. libdeflate 12 compresses more than zlib 9 … WebMar 31, 2024 · In .NET 8 Preview 3, we’re very happy to introduce native AOT support for ASP.NET Core, with an initial focus on cloud-native API applications. It’s now possible to publish an ASP.NET Core app with native AOT, producing a self-contained app that’s ahead-of-time (AOT) compiled to native code. Native AOT apps can have a smaller … hellohellonails

Kraken Vs ZLIB: 29% Smaller Game Sizes Losslessly, 297% Faster ... - NeoGAF

WebSep 2, 2016 · The new Zstandard 1.0 compression algorithm, recently open sourced by Facebook, is one of the few compression algorithms that is both faster and more efficient than zlib, the current “reigning ... WebNot a rebuild, but two good alternatives to zlib are quicklz and fastlz. Both are very fast relative to gzip -1, but do not achieve as good of a compression ratio. For my application, size was going up 10-15% but compression speed was 6x, so a very good tradeoff. WebZSTD is actually faster than reading decompressed: significantly less data is coming from the IO subsystem. We know LZ4 is significantly ... CF-ZLIB uses a different, faster hash … hellohinote